significance of the sexual encounters between Rahel and Estha, and Ammu and Velutha in GOD OF SMALL THINGS
The God of Small Things builds an
incredible amount of anticipation and expectation for the definitive moment of the story. With all of its
foreshadowing, its emphasis on tracing one's steps, and its insistent
suggestion that everything, from politics to erotic desire, is intimately
connected, Roy's novel places a great deal of emphasis on the central event of
the twins' childhood that caused the momentous changes in the Kochamma family.
The reader comes to expect, because of the narrator's many references to
"the Loss of Sophie Mol," that everything will boil down to one key
moment, and that this moment will involve Sophie Mol's death.
It
eventually becomes clear, however, that Sophie Mol's actual drowning is an
accident, an understated tragedy in which she simply vanishes in the river.
Like all of the characters' lives and the events of the plot, Sophie Mol's
death is intimately tied to many other elements, including Estha's sexual
abuse, Sophie Mol's relationship to the twins, and the host of factors that led
to the tragedy. But the actual loss of Sophie Mol does not reveal much about
the deep historical forces at work in Ayemenem, and it does not explain what
truly causes or defines the Kochamma family's experience.
Instead,
Roy's trajectory of foreshadowing and anticipation leads to the two forbidden,
taboo erotic relationships of the novel€between Ammu and Velutha, and Estha and
Rahel. These are the episodes at the core of the unraveling plot and the crux
of the book's meaning. All of the tension, desire, and desperation beneath the
surface of the narrative converges into these expressions of love, which are
examples of perhaps the greatest, most unthinkable taboos of all. This essay
will discuss why the two forbidden sexual episodes in the final two chapters of
The God of Small Things are so crucial
to the history of the Kochamma family and the emblematic of the meaning of the
novel.
Before
discussing the significance of these episodes, however, it will help to
establish how and why they are so closely connected. It is immediately clear
that they have much in common as doomed, forbidden love trysts, and it is no
coincidence that they are revealed and described next to each other, at the end
of the narrative. However, there are other, less obvious connections. During
Estha and Rahel's erotic encounter, for example, there are repeated references
to Ammu such as calling Rahel's mouth "Their beautiful mother's
mouth" and there is the statement that the twins are at the "viable
die-able age" of thirty, Ammu's age between her affair with Velutha and
her death. Equally important is the phrase, "They were strangers who had
met in a chance encounter," because it is more applicable to Velutha and
Ammu than to the twins. Also key at this point, late in chapter 20, is the
narrator's statement about Rahel and Estha that "once again they broke the
Love Laws," which uses the term that had previously been applied to Ammu
and Velutha and implies that the twins' situation is a reoccurrence of the
affair of 1969.
By closely
connecting Rahel and Estha's sexual relationship to Ammu and Velutha's, Roy
suggests that present-day events converge with the events surrounding Sophie
Mol's death, and that each strain of the plot has the same thematic resolution.
The two instances of breaking of the Love Laws form a key to understanding the
rest of the book; they are both the result and the cause of the novel's action.
This is why the narrator writes that the story "really began in the days
when the Love Laws were made," back through the colonial and pre-colonial
history of Kerala. The Love Laws represent the strict confines on human
behavior€the caste systems, social pressures, and political restrictions that
horrify people beyond expression when they are broken. The central action of
the novel is about breaking them, and the tragedy that results from breaking
them.
For one
thing, therefore, the forbidden love affairs at the end of the novel are
crucial because they reveal the disgust and horror with the lovers that is at
the root of the violence and tragedy directed against them. Present-day Western
readers probably do not consider inter-caste romance repulsive, but they are
quite likely to be shocked and offended by incest. Incest is as taboo in
twenty-first-century Western society as an inter-caste
sexual affair would have been in the 1960s, and probably still is, in Kerala.
The reader's reaction to such violations of the Love Laws allows him/her to
understand how and why such drastic social and political consequences could
have resulted from the transgressions at the end of The God of Small Things. Roy allows the reader an insight into the
emotional basis behind the careful, planned brutality of those dedicated to
Kerala's social code, such as the Touchable Policemen who believe that in
beating Velutha to death they are enforcing the Love Laws and "inoculating
a community against an outbreak."
However,
the love affairs also allow the reader to identify with the transgressor, and
they inspire a sympathetic reaction for four people who are abused, tortured,
and betrayed by their society's most fundamental rules. The reasons for Ammu's
turn to Velutha are sharply drawn and inspire a great deal of sympathy when she
studies her body, the body of an "inexperienced lover," in the mirror
and peers "down the road to Age and Death through its parted
strands." Ammu's love affair is, in a sense, the cause of the novel's
tragedy because it shatters her family, condemns Velutha to a brutal death,
traumatizes Rahel and Estha for the rest of their lives, and results in her own
decay and death. It is also, however, the result of an entire lifetime of
abuse, confinement, and imprisonment in a stinting social code. This code not
only fails to protect Ammu against her father beating her with a brass vase,
her father imprisoning her in the house even when she is an adult, and her
husband beating her; it actually leads to these consequences. When she
recognizes that Kerala's social code is in the process of forcing her down Baby
Kochamma's path of bitter, joyless confinement to the house until death, she
acts in perfectly understandable desperation and attempts to find some brief
joy with Velutha.
Similarly,
Rahel's affair with Estha can be interpreted as the result of a social code,
both in Kerala and in the United States, that has traumatized her and deprived
her of her childhood. The "Quietness and Emptiness" that characterize
Estha and Rahel stems from Velutha's death and their parents' difficulties in
raising them, but also stems from a society that is cruel, harassing, and
violent towards a single mother and her children. From Baby Kochamma to Chacko
to the Orangedrink Lemondrink Man, people are
prejudiced towards Ammu and her children, and take advantage of them. Rahel and
Estha's incestuous contact is their attempt to find comfort in each other,
although, unlike Ammu and Velutha, they are not even able to reach a joyful
release from their problems, and "what they shared that night was not
happiness but hideous grief."
In addition
to what they reveal about the cultural and political content of Roy's novel,
the two affairs communicate a great deal about the novel's psychological
subtext. In the course of the book, both Ammu and Rahel experience identity
crises whose primary goals are, in a sense, discovering who and what they are
in relation to their culture and family. Rahel travels back to Ayemenem to see
her brother, but her journey is perhaps better described as a quest, through
her memories, to discover herself and the roots of her history. The
third-person narrator of The God of Small
Things is omniscient, and not
strictly confined to any particular perspective, but the narrative voice is grounded in Rahel's memories. Events and
remembrances weave into the story as they might appear in Rahel's mind, and the
novel is structured around her search to understand herself and her past.
Rahel's
incestuous contact with Estha is so crucial and definitive in this identity
search because, as the narrator stresses insistently, her brother is herself.
In opening passages of the novel, the narrator relates that, during their
childhood, "Esthappen and Rahel thought of themselves together as Me, and
separately, individually, as We or Us. As though they were a rare breed of
Siamese twins, physically separate, but with joint identities." The twins'
love-making is a metaphor for their search for this fractured and traumatized
joint identity in their adulthood, and it is a real, physical and emotional
expression of their grief and longing.
Ammu's
affair with Velutha is also, in a sense, a search for herself; this is clear
from the lengthy passages in which the narrator describes the desperation in
Ammu's strictly confined life and her need to live and experience joy. When
Ammu studies herself in the mirror and tests whether a toothbrush will stay on
her breast, she reveals that she understands herself through her body and her
sexual identity, and she seeks out Velutha in order to discover
the beautiful part of herself.
The
forbidden love affairs that come at the end of Roy's novel, therefore, work
together to provide a single metaphor for the key struggles and meanings of the
novel. The twins' incestuous contact and Ammu's affair with Velutha are
metaphors for, and physical enactments of, the psychological identity struggles
of the novel's protagonists. These struggles extend, by implication and because
they are so closely connected to the political subtext of the novel, to the
wider political and psychological identity struggles of all those afflicted by
the oppressive social code of southern Indian culture.
Carefully considered and reasoned: if Nature compels fish to swim in potholes, then brother sleeping with sister (twin sleeping with twin/self sleeping with self) should not be as shocking as it comes to be.
ReplyDeleteA note: it is Mammachi who is beaten with the brass vase-- Ammu has her galoshes cut up with Pappachi's scissors.
I loved reading this. Puts a lot of things in perspective.
ReplyDelete